Peer Review Process

All manuscripts submitted to the journal undergo a rigorous evaluation to ensure the quality, originality, and relevance of published work. Each submission is first screened by the editorial team for contribution, plagiarism, scope alignment, and overall presentation. Manuscripts that meet these criteria proceed to the peer review stage.

The journal follows a double-blind peer review process, in which both authors and reviewers remain anonymous to each other. Each manuscript is evaluated by at least two independent reviewers, who may be members of the editorial board or external experts in the field. Reviewers assess the manuscript’s originality, methodological soundness, clarity of presentation, and significance of contribution to the discipline.

Based on the reviewers’ feedback, the editor communicates a decision to the authors, which may include acceptance, minor/major revisions, or rejection. Where revisions are requested, authors are expected to address all comments and resubmit within the stipulated timeframe. The editorial team ensures that all correspondence, including review reports and editorial decisions, is conducted via email.

The typical review process takes a minimum of 8 weeks to reach a final decision. The editor-in-chief’s decision is final and binding in all publication matters.